READER ã DOC Coming HomeFREE Ù ROGER DLAUNIUS

TEXT Ë Coming Home Ï Roger D. Launius

Coming HomeGram astronauts rode a blunt body capsule with an ablative heat shield to a water landing where the Navy rescued them Project Gemini eventually used a similar approach but NASA engineers experimented with a Rogallo wing and a proposed landing at the Flight Research Center now Dryden Flight Research Center on skids similar to those employed on the X When the Rogallo wing failed to make the rapid progress reuired NASA returned to the parachute concept used in Mercury and essentially used the same approach in Apollo although with greatly improved ablative heat shields At the same time the DOD pursued a spaceplane concept with the X  Dyna Soar orbital vehicle that would have replaced the ablative heat shield witha reusable metallic heat shield and a lifting reentry that allowed the pilot to fly the vehicle to a runway landing This is also the general approach pursued by theDOD with its Aerothermodynamic Elastic Structural Systems Environmental Tests ASSET and Martin X A Precision Reentry Including ManeuveringreEntry PRIME vehicles NASA and DOD also experimented with lifting body concepts Engineers were able to make both of those approaches to reentry and landing work making tradeoffs on various other capabilities in the process The eventual direction of these programs was influenced by technological choices than by obvious decisionsEven as Apollo was reaching fruition in the late s NASA made the decision to abandon blunt body capsules with ablative heat shields and recovery systems that relied on parachutes for its human space flight program Instead as shown in chapters and it chose to build the Space Shuttle a winged reusable vehicle that still had a blunt body configuration but used a new ceramic tile and reinforced carbon carbon for its thermal protection system Parachutes were also jettisoned in favor of a delta wing aerodynamic concept that allowed runway landings Despite many challenges and the loss of one vehicle and its crew due to a failure with the thermal protection system this approach has worked relatively effectively since first flown in Although NASA engineers debated the necessity of including jet engines on the Shuttle it employed the unpowered landing concept demonstrated by the X and lifting body programs at the Flight Research Center during the s These chapters lay out that effort and what it has meant for returning from space and landing on EarthThe concluding chapter explores efforts to develop new reentry and landing concepts in the s and beyond During this period a series of ideasemerged on reentry and landing concepts including the return of a metallic heat shield for the National Aero Space Plane and the X the Roton rotaryrocket the DC X powered landing concept and the Crew Exploration Vehicle CEV of the Constellation program between and In every casethese projects proved too technologically difficult and the funding was too sparse

BOOK Coming Home

❴Read❵ ➲ Coming Home Author Roger D. Launius – Tushna-hram.ru This study represents a means of highlighting the myriad of technological developments that made possible the safe reentry and return  from space and the landing on Earth This story extends back at lRead Coming Home Author Roger D Launius Tushna hramru This study represents a means of highlighting the myriad of technological developments that made possible the safe reentry and return  from space and the landing on Earth This story extends back at l This study represents a means of highlighting the myriad of technological developments that made possible the safe reentry and return  from space and the landing on Earth This story extends back at least to the work of Walter Hohmann and Eugen Sänger in Germany in the s and involved numerous aerospace engineers at the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics NACANASA Langley and the Lewis now the John H Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field and Ames Research Centers For example researchers such as H Julian Allen and Alfred J Eggers Jr at Ames pioneered blunt body reentry techniues and ablative thermal protection systems in the s while Francis M Rogallo at Langley developed creative parasail concepts that informed the development of the recovery systems of numerous reentry vehiclesThe chapters that follow relate in a chronological manner the way in which  NASA has approached the challenge of reentering the atmosphere after a space mission and the technologies associated with safely dealing with the friction of this encounter and the methods used for landing safely on EarthThe first chapter explores the conceptual efforts to understand the nature of flight to and from space and the major developments in the technologies of reentry and landing that took place before the beginning of the space age in Chapter also investigates the methods of landing once a spacecraft reaches subsonic speeds Once the orbital energy is converted and the heat of reentry dissipated the spacecraft must still be landed gently in the ocean or on land Virtually all of the early concepts for human space flight involve spaceplanes that flew on wings to a runway landing; Sänger’s antipodal bomber of the s did so as did von Braun’s popular concepts However these proved impractical for launch vehicles available during the s and capsule concepts that returned to Earth via parachute proliferated largely because they represented the “art of the possible” at the timeChapter tells the story of reentry from space and landing on Earth from the beginning of the space age through the end of the Apollo program During that period NASA and other agencies concerned with the subject developed capsules with blunt body ablative heat shields and recovery systems that relied on parachutes The Department of Defense DOD tested this reentry concept publicly with Project SCORE Signal Communication by Orbiting Relay Euipment in and employed it throughout the CORONA satellite reconnaissance program of the s snatching in midair return capsules containing unprocessed surveillance footage dangling beneath parachutes With the Mercury pro

Roger D. Launius Ï Coming Home PDF

For success Even the CEV a program that returns to a capsule conceptwith a blunt body ablative heat shield and parachutes or perhaps a Rogallo wing to return to Earth or perhaps the ocean proved a challenge for engineers The recovery of scientific sample return missions to Earth both with the loss of Genesis and the successful return of Stardust suggests that these issues are not exclusive to the human space flight community As this work is completed NASA has embarked on the Commercial Crew Development CCDev program in which four firms are competing for funding to complete work on their vehicles•         Blue Origin Kent WA—a biconic capsule that could be launched on an Atlas rocket•         Sierra Nevada Corporation Louisville CO—Dream Chaser lifting body which could be deployed from the Virgin Galactic•         White Knight Two carrier aircraft for flight tests•         Space Exploration Technologies SpaceX Hawthorne CA—•         Dragon capsule spacecraft; also a partial lifting body concept to be launched on the Falcon heavy lifter•         The Boeing Company Houston TX—a person spacecraft including both personnel and cargo configurations designed to be launched by several different rockets and to be reusable up to timesThese new ideas and a broad set of actions stimulated through the CCDev  program suggest that reentry and recovery from space remains an unsettled issue in space flight This book’s concluding chapter suggests that our understanding of the longstanding complexities associated with returning to Earth safely has benefited from changes in technology and deeper knowledge of the process; however these issues are still hotly debated and disagreement remains about how best to accomplish these challenging tasks Engineers have had success with several different approaches to resolving the challenges of reentry and landingDiscovering the optimal most elegant solutions reuires diligence and creativity This history seeks to tell this complex story in a compelling sophisticated  and technically sound manner for an audience that understands little about the evolution of flight technology Bits and pieces of this history exist in other publications but often overlooked is the critical role these concepts played in making a safe return to Earth possible Moreover the challenges mysteries and outcomes that these programs’ members wrestled with offer object lessons in how earlier generations of engineers sought optimal solutions and made tradeoffsWith the CCDev program—a multiphase program intended to stimulate the development of privately operated crew vehicles to low Earth orbit currently underway—NASA is returning to a capsule concept for space flight This may prove a significant development and this history could help enlighten the NASA team about past efforts and the lessons learned from those effort

READER ã DOC Coming HomeFREE Ù ROGER DLAUNIUS Librarian Note There is than one author in the Goodreads database with this nameDr Roger D Launius earned MA and PhD degrees in history at Louisiana State University Baton Rouge American frontier and military historyDr Launius was a civilian historian with the United States Air Force and became Chief Historian for the Military Airlift Command Since October he is Chief Hist.

4 Comments on "READER ã DOC Coming HomeFREE Ù ROGER DLAUNIUS"

  • Jonathan Jeckell

    READER ã DOC Coming HomeFREE Ù ROGER DLAUNIUS Coming HomeExceeded my expectations I learned a lot from this book I knew NASA did a lot of work with space planes like the X 15 lifting bodies etc but I learned that those were NASA's primary plan and capsules were only grudgingly used because of the urgency to get people up in space and the limitations of the rockets that were ready to go Astronauts hated the capsules and the rescue at sea mainly because they were drawn from the test pilot pool The capsules inherited a lot of technology from making it possible for nuclear warheads launched on ballistic missiles to reenter safely The Mercury capsules launched on Redstone rockets used a heat sink based heatshield and were the only ones to fly a true ballistic trajectory The others used an ablativ


  • Gert-Jan

    READER ã DOC Coming HomeFREE Ù ROGER DLAUNIUS Coming HomeInteresting


  • Blakearmin

    READER ã DOC Coming HomeFREE Ù ROGER DLAUNIUS Coming HomeIf you're a space geek at all read it Incredibly fascinating account on the hardware side of one small part of space and missile operations


  • Daniel Beck

    READER ã DOC Coming HomeFREE Ù ROGER DLAUNIUS Coming HomeThis book is an interesting introduction to building spacecraft that can return to Earth's surface and the history of the engineering that makes it possible It somewhat obliuely makes the case that the course of the US space program has been heavily influenced by the overwhelming appeal of a flyable spacecraft in the face of the extreme technical difficulty of actually building one The main fault of this book is that it's almost exclusively concerned with Earth reentry from the perspective of the US space program It only briefly mentions reentry for the exploration of Mars Jupiter and Titan and does not mention reentry demands for visiting Venus at all which is consistent with the book's overall avoidance of mentionin